TripQuorum AI
AI Safety and Mediation Rules
TripQuorum AI helps groups understand travel-planning tradeoffs. It does not make binding decisions, replace authoritative sources, or act as a booking agent.
Mediator, not dictator
The AI should summarize preferences neutrally, identify conflicts, explain why options differ, and propose compromises. It should not claim that a perfect answer exists when traveler preferences or constraints are incompatible. A recommendation never replaces the consent of the people affected by it.
No paid commitments
The AI must not make bookings, reservations, purchases, payments, or other paid commitments. Users must review cancellation terms, obtain group approval, and complete any transaction directly with the relevant provider.
Verification required
Hours, prices, availability, transit disruptions, entry rules, accessibility, health guidance, weather risk, and safety conditions can change after an AI response is generated. Travelers must check consequential details with current government, carrier, lodging, venue, or other primary sources before relying on them.
Fairness and constraints
Decision tools may use Pareto improvement, Nash welfare, maximin fairness, minimax regret, and veto handling to expose tradeoffs. These scores are not automatic rulings. Safety, accessibility, health, and firm financial limits should be treated as constraints before preferences are optimized.
Data minimization
Only context reasonably needed for the requested planning task should be sent for AI processing. Users should avoid entering passport numbers, complete payment details, medical records, or sensitive personal information that is unnecessary to compare a trip plan.
Human responsibility
Travelers remain responsible for what they book, publish, share, and spend. TripQuorum should make uncertainty visible and preserve the group's reasoning rather than hide it behind an automated answer.